Dark Snake Syndrome
Spell Continuous

Dark Snake Syndrome

  • View:
  • 3641




During each of your Standby Phases: Inflict damage to both players. This damage begins at 200 and is doubled during each of your following Standby Phases.




 
 
AI Power Analysis
UtilityConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 8, 2026
39± 6/ 100
Power Score
Intrinsic 40
Deck 39

Dark Snake Syndrome — Power Evaluation

Final Score: 39 ± 6 · Confidence: Medium

  • Intrinsic: 40 · Deck: 39 · Meta: provisional
  • Primary role: Utility · Secondary: Boss/End-board

Why it scores here

Dark Snake Syndrome is a Continuous Spell that deals damage to both players each of your Standby Phases, starting at 200 and doubling each time. It converts into a slow, symmetric damage clock with no board presence, no card advantage, no searching and no material value, so it scores as a utility finisher rather than a power engine. Its 11-deck presence across 8 archetypes at 1-3 copies confirms it is a live, cheap pick, but that frequency is not treated as strength, and high ATK-style stats are absent from the calculation entirely.

Axis scores

Axis Score Evidence
Accessibility 45 Once drawn it stays live on the field, but there is no searcher or recorded starter/searched evidence to support a reliable route to it (verified text; observed 11 decks, inferred no searcher).
Combo & Conversion 20 The card only deals damage and builds no board; with zero recorded combo boards there is no observed conversion (verified text; combos absent, so inferred only).
Resource Economy 25 No draw, search, or recursion is printed, so it generates no card advantage and only applies damage (verified text).
Effect & Interaction 15 Its damage is symmetric and does not negate, remove, or restrict the opponent's cards, so interaction is minimal (verified text).
Material Utility 5 It is a Spell and cannot be used as Link, Xyz, Synchro, or Fusion material, so it has no material value (verified text).
Resilience & Flexibility 40 It stays on the field across turns, but a single destruction or removal effect ends the clock (inferred from Continuous Spell type).
Deck-Building Efficiency 70 It is a single-slot, non-garnet spell with no lock or brick cost and 1-3 copies per deck (observed 11 decks, copies distribution 1 and 3).

Calculation

Weight profile: 0.7 Utility + 0.3 Boss/End-board. Intrinsic ≈ 40, Deck ≈ 39, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: Symmetric self-damage (-2). Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck

Strengths

  • Repeatable damage that doubles each Standby Phase, so it can close games once it is in play
  • Continuous Spell with no per-activation cost
  • Played across 8 archetypes at 1-3 copies, so it is a live utility pick (observed)

Weaknesses

  • Symmetric damage also hurts the controller, especially when behind on LP
  • No card advantage, search, or material value
  • A single destruction or removal effect ends the clock
  • Recorded combo evidence is absent, so no observed conversion

Counters / choke points

  • Spell destruction or removal effects (inferred from Continuous Spell type)
  • Opponent LP lead, which makes the symmetric damage race favor them (inferred)

Best use

Utility finisher clock. Decks: Exosister, Dark Magician, Exodia.

Evidence & gaps

  • Verified: Continuous Spell whose effect deals damage to both players during each of your Standby Phases, starting at 200 and doubling each following Standby Phase; Spell type means it cannot be material
  • Observed: Appears in 11 of the attached decks across 8 archetypes; Copies per deck: 7 decks run 1 copy and 4 decks run 3 copies, average 1.73; Summoner Monk and Chicken Game each appear in 63.6% of its decks
  • Inferred: No searcher or recorded starter route exists, so accessibility is partial; Its symmetric damage makes it a finisher only when the controller holds an LP lead; Single removal ends its clock
  • Data gaps: no combos supplied, so combo conversion is text-only inference no guides supplied legal copies is empty, so the 3-copy limit is assumed no usage statistics (StatisticsCard) for archetype inclusion, so inclusion is inferred from the deck sample only











https://metaduelist.com/
Top